True or False: Complaints against licensees involving drug or alcohol impairment may remain anonymous at the request of the complainant.

The statement is true because, in Nevada, individuals who submit complaints about licensed professionals, including dentists, related to drug or alcohol impairment, have the option to remain anonymous if they choose. This provision is designed to encourage the reporting of such serious issues without the fear of retaliation or personal repercussions for the complainant. Maintaining anonymity can help ensure that potential violations are reported, allowing the appropriate authorities to investigate and take necessary actions to protect public safety.

In dealing with complaints regarding substance impairment, the system recognizes the sensitive nature of these issues and aims to provide a safeguard for those willing to come forward. This encourages a culture of accountability while protecting those who might otherwise be hesitant to report their concerns. The intent is to promote honesty and diligence in the reporting process, particularly in cases that could impact the health and safety of patients.

Other choices are inaccurate because they either impose unnecessary restrictions on anonymity or incorrectly state the nature of complaints and their confidentiality. For example, saying that complaints can only remain anonymous for minor complaints or require Board permission does not align with the overarching policy aimed at protecting the whistleblower.